3.3. Radiometry#

Unlike Colorimetry, which deals with the analysis of colors that originate from the changes to the spectrum of a light source (‘illuminant’) by absorption or scattering of a sample, radiometry involves the characterization of the light source itself. The Radiometry window (Figure 3.7), which can be accessed using Analysis ‣ Radiometry, provides the following functionality:

Important

For the computed values of energy or brighntess to be physically meaningful, the spectrometer has to be calibrated using a light source with

  • a known spectrum

  • a known power output

To minimize geometric effects, the collection setup has to be carefully considered, for example by using an integrating sphere.

For qualitative comparison of light sources and their quality, omitting this calibration step is possible as long as the sensitivity curve of the spectrometer does not result in spectral distortion in the visible range.

See also

See Section 4.3 - Radiometric Analyis of Light Sources to see this in practice.

../_images/analysis_radiometry_window.png

Fig. 3.7 The Radiometry window#

The Ratiometry window (Figure 3.7) hosts the following controls / UI elements (from top to bottom):

  1. the settings bar

  2. the spectrum view

  3. the Color Vector Graphic

  4. the result sidebar

  5. the quality metrics view

3.3.1. The Settings Bar#

The Settings bar offers the following settings:

Parameter

switches between Power (emitted energy) and Lux (perceived brightness) (Figure 3.8). To compute the perceived brightness, the spectrum is multiplied by a standardized human eye sensitivity curve V(\(\lambda\)), which is centered around 550 nm.

Power Power
Lumen Lumen

Fig. 3.8 Energy vs perceived brightness#

Start

The lower spectral bound used to determine the emitted power

End

The upper spectral bound used to determine the emitted power

Hint

The area used for integration is indicated by the shaded region in the spectrum view.

Accessory Display

Toggles the (optional) display of either:

  • the reference illuminant used for calculating the color fidelity index \(R_f\) and the color gamut index \(R_g\). For a color temperature (CCT) < 5000 K, a theoretical Planckian (black-body) radiator at that CCT will be used, for higher color temperatures, the CIE Daylight distribution will be used. See Figure 4.7 for further examples of reference illuminants.

  • the raw spectral data (before intensity calibration)

    Hint

    Displaying the raw spectral data can be useful to judge how much of the dynamic range of the spectrometer is actually used and to optimize acquisition parameters to obtain a high-signal-to-noise ratio while avoiding saturating the detector.

3.3.2. The IES TM-30-18 Color Vector Graphic#

The Color Vector Graphic translates the numerical color quality data of a light source derived from its spectral power distribution (SPD) into a visual map of color shifts. The graphic is a circular plot that visually represents how a test light source changes the hue and saturation of colors compared to an ideal reference source (like daylight or a black-body radiator). It is divided into 16 hue bins (sections around the circle), which makes it easy to identify deficiencies or enhancements in specific color ranges (Figure 3.9).

../_images/analysis_radiometry_cvg.png

Fig. 3.9 The Color Vector Graphic#

This plot shows:

The Reference Ring

The central black circle in Figure 3.9 represents the chromaticity coordinates of the 99 Test Color Samples (TCSs, also see Section 3.3.4.1) when illuminated by the reference source (the ideal source for that color temperature).

The Test Vector

The red line in Figure 3.9 shows the average chromaticity coordinates of the TCSs in each of the 16 hue bins when illuminated by the test light source.

By comparing the solid red line (test source) to the solid black line (reference source), one can determine the light source’s local color rendering characteristics:

  • Radial Distance (Saturation/Chroma Shift):

    • Inward Shift: If the red line falls inside the black circle, the test light source is desaturating (making duller) the colors in that specific hue bin.

    • Outward Shift: If the red line falls outside the black circle, the test light source is oversaturating (making more vivid) the colors in that hue bin. This shift is quantified by the Color Gamut Index (\(\text{R}_g\)), which gives the average saturation shift

  • Tangential Distance (Hue Shift):

    • Clockwise Shift: The light source is shifting the perceived hue (the pure color) of objects in that bin towards the next color in the clockwise direction (e.g., from green toward yellow-green).

    • Counter-Clockwise Shift: The hue is being shifted towards the next color in the counter-clockwise direction.

      While there is no single hue-shift metric, this visual distortion is captured within the overall Color Fidelity Index (\(\text{R}_f\)) and the Local Color Fidelity (\(\text{R}_{f, \text{hue}}\)) for that bin.

In addition, the plot displays the following metrics:

Color Fidelity Index, \(\text{R}_f\)

Measures the color accuracy or fidelity of the light source on a scale from 0 to 100. It tells us how closely the colors of objects will appear to their “true” color as seen under the reference light (usually daylight or a black-body radiator).

Color Gamut index, \(\text{R}_g\)

Measures the average increase or decrease in the saturation (chroma) of the colors rendered by the light source on a scale from 0 to 100. This metric is crucial because light sources, especially LEDs, can be designed to pump out intense light in specific wavelength bands (like red and green) to make colors “pop,” even if the fidelity (\(\rm{R}_f\)) isn’t perfect.

Correlated Color Temperature (CCT)

Indicates the color temperature of the light source in Kelvins (K). The CCT is calculated from the light source’s \(X, Y, Z\) tristimulus values, which are then used to determine its Correlated Color Temperature (CCT) from its position on the chromaticity diagram.

The \(\rm{D_{uv}}\) Value

Quantifies a light source’s chromaticity offset from the Planckian Locus

  • a positive \(\rm{D_{uv}}\) indicates that the light source’s chromaticity is above the Planckian Locus. This results in a greenish or yellowish-green tint.

  • a negative \(\rm{D_{uv}}\) indicates that the light source’s chromaticity is below the Planckian Locus. This results a pinkish or magenta tint.

3.3.3. The Result Sidebar#

The result section contains the calculated power and brightness. Here, you can also select which color quality metric to compute:

  • Color Rendering Index (CRI)

  • Color Quality Scale (CQS)

  • Color Fidelity Index (CFI)

  • Local Color Fidelity

  • Local Hue Shift

  • Local Chroma Shift

Results for the selected metric will be displayed at the bottom in addition to updating the test color sample graph.

3.3.4. Color Quality Metrics#

  • Color Rendering Index (CRI), \(\rm{R_{\alpha}}\), a score between 0 and 100 that measures the light source’s ability to render colors accurately (Figure 3.10). The CRI is calculated using the CIE 2024 standard. The \(\text{R}_a\) score (General CRI) is based on the first eight samples (\(\text{R}_1\) to \(\text{R}_8\)).

    Note

    While standard, CRI is known to have limitations, particularly for LED lighting with sharp spectral peaks, which can lead to a high CRI with poor appearance: A high \(\text{R}_a\) value can be achieved even if the light source is poor at rendering certain saturated colors (especially deep red, \(\text{R}_9\), which is not included in the \(\text{R}_a\) average).

  • Color Quality Scale (CQS) (Figure 3.10). The CQS attempts to overcome limitations of the CRI, in particular the use of de-saturated test colors, which allowed LEDs with narrow spectral peaks (often missing deep reds) to score high while still rendering certain saturated colors poorly. CQS uses 15 saturated colors, ensuring the test light source is properly evaluated across the full color spectrum. The CQS is calculated using the NIST CQS 9.0 standard.

  • the IES TM-30-18 Color Fidelity Index (CFI) (Figure 3.10). This metric:

    • uses 99 test colors

    • separates fidelity (\(\text{R}_f\)) from gamut/saturation (\(\text{R}_g\))

    See also

    The color vector graphic is part of this analysis. Please see this section for a discussion of the parameters \(\text{R}_f\) and \(\text{R}_g\).

  • Local Color Fidelity (Figure 3.10), which compares the color fidelity accuracy across specific hue bins around the color wheel. The hue bins are the same as in the color vector graphic

  • Local Hue Shift and Local Chroma Shift reflect the hue / chroma differences compared to an ideal emitter and correspond to the direction / magnitude of the arrows in the color vector graphic.

3.3.4.1. The Test Color Sample Graph#

The test color sample graph Figure 3.10 contains test color samples (TCS) in varying number and color depending on which color quality metric was selected. The color of each bar indicates the appearance of the test color sample as rendered considering the spectral distribution of the light source.

Color Rendering Index Color Rendering Index
Color Quality Scale Color Quality Scale
Color Fidelity Index Color Fidelity Index
Local Color Fidelity Local Color Fidelity

Fig. 3.10 Comparison of Color Rendering Metrics for the LED lightsource in Figure 3.7.#

See also

The (as of late) free tool BabelColor provides further radiometric analysis options.